Homeland war

Ante Gotovina

The book deals with General Anto Gotovina, that is, the indictment brought against him at the Hague Tribunal, as well as the political climate in Croatia at the time of the indictment and Gotovina's escape from the Croatian judiciary.

Braniteljsko zajedništvo putokaz hrvatskoga dostojanstva

The book, divided into four large sections, contains journalistic articles from Glas Koncila that have been written in recent years, as well as several previously unpublished texts.

Demografski kontekst i sociokulturne posljedice hrvatskoga domovinskog rata

The authors pointed out the demographic situation in Croatia in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the demographic trends in the war-affected areas of Croatia, the demographic war losses and the long-term demographic consequences of the war.

Gdje su naši najmiliji?

Geneza teritorijalne pretenzije Srbije prema Hrvatskoj i kršenje ratnih zakona i običaja tijekom Domovinskog rata od strane agresora

Genocide : ethnic cleansing in Northwestern Bosnia

The work documents and shows the creation of the Republika Srpska with its capital Banja Luka as part of the larger Republika Srpska Krajina and the war crimes committed against the Muslims and Croats of Northwestern Bosnia. Book in English, German and Fr

Hrvatska borba za opstojnost 1918.-1998.

Das Buch enthält einen Bericht über die Geschichte Kroatiens von 1918 bis 1998 in vier historischen Perioden (1918–1941; 1941–1945, 1945–1990 und 1990–1998).

Hrvatsko ratno pismo 1991/92. - apeli, iskazi, pjesme / Croatian war writing 1991/92 - appeals, viewpoints, poems

Das Buch präsentiert eine Chronologie des intellektuellen und zivilen Widerstands während des Heimatkrieges. Vergleichen Sie den kroatischen Text und die englische Übersetzung.

Krv, baranjska

Diese historische und politische Literatur deckt den Zeitraum von der Frühgeschichte bis zum Heimatkrieg ab.

Locirati, identificirati, uhititi, transferirati: Izdajnici i sluge

Journalist Milan Ivkošić said that the book contains texts by authors who differ ideologically and that some of them do not share Glavaš's views, but, as he maintains, wrote objectively about his case.